On 30 Jan 2014, at 21:38, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> On 2014-01-31 04:24, wiki_at_wiki.squid-cache.org wrote:
>
> <snip>
>> + || RPS || 39715 ||
>> + || Bandwidth || 313 Mbit/sec sustained ||
>> +
>
> ... "600-bytes long document". Thats 1KB per transaction.
>
>> + This number was taken in a '''controlled test environment'''. It has
>> nothing to do with the numbers someone would get in a production
>> environment; it's just an estimate of how fast squid can be.
>> + Squid was configured to do no logging, no access control, and
>> apachebench was used to hammer squid asking 10M times for a static,
>> cacheable, 600-bytes long document. Of the 4 cores, 3 were running a
>> multi-worker squid, one was running ab over the loopback interface.
>> +
>
> Something seems to have slowed dow. I was getting roughly 8x that with similar test environment (but single-core utilized by Squid) on 3.1 transferring ~4KB objects. Although strangely it maxed at 100-200 Mbit/sec for all the increased object size and throughput.
>
> What concurrency level was AB set to? I have seen quite a bit of variance in speed by concurrency level.
100.
I can do some random tests at different levels of concurrency, if useful.
K
Received on Thu Jan 30 2014 - 20:52:28 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jan 31 2014 - 12:00:17 MST