On 2014-01-31 04:24, wiki_at_wiki.squid-cache.org wrote:
<snip>
> + || RPS || 39715 ||
> + || Bandwidth || 313 Mbit/sec sustained ||
> +
... "600-bytes long document". Thats 1KB per transaction.
> + This number was taken in a '''controlled test environment'''. It has
> nothing to do with the numbers someone would get in a production
> environment; it's just an estimate of how fast squid can be.
> + Squid was configured to do no logging, no access control, and
> apachebench was used to hammer squid asking 10M times for a static,
> cacheable, 600-bytes long document. Of the 4 cores, 3 were running a
> multi-worker squid, one was running ab over the loopback interface.
> +
Something seems to have slowed dow. I was getting roughly 8x that with
similar test environment (but single-core utilized by Squid) on 3.1
transferring ~4KB objects. Although strangely it maxed at 100-200
Mbit/sec for all the increased object size and throughput.
What concurrency level was AB set to? I have seen quite a bit of
variance in speed by concurrency level.
Amos
Received on Thu Jan 30 2014 - 20:38:05 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jan 31 2014 - 12:00:17 MST