On 24/06/11 13:53, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 24/06/11 05:23, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
>> I have some other problems probably with this patch.
>>
>> Currently trying to use a parent cache does not work for me.
>> I am testing the configuration with older squid trees and I have not any
>> problem.
>>
>> Did the configuration parameters changed? Are there changes I should
>> take care about?
>>
>
> No changes to the peer config or expected behaviour. The only thing
> remotely related is reduction in pconn pooled for each one. And that
> peer selection ends with DNS lookup Comm::Connection creation.
>
> There are some bugs that have popped out of the background completely
> unexpected related to the HTTP request text generated.
>
> http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3247
> I'm on this right now.
Fixed. This had side-effects in all cache_peer dependent logics. So very
likely your problem is now fixed too.
>
> http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3252
> is this related to the maybeReadVirginBody() patch Alex comitted a few
> hours ago?
>
> http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3253
> Plan on getting to this next if nobody else beats me to it. Not exactly
> a regression on earlier, but was supposed to be fixed by the new changes.
Seems not to exist any more. Though not exactly sure why.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12 Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.9 and 3.1.12.3Received on Fri Jun 24 2011 - 05:29:02 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 24 2011 - 12:00:05 MDT