Re: [RFC] 3.1 branching

> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 02:16 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> >
>> > Lets set a date: 29 September?
>> >
>> > Well, I'll call for a partial hold right now. Please only commit bug
>> > fixes, minor cleanups, and features already on the roadmap for 3.1.
>> > The rest can be queued for commit post branch.
>> >
>>
>>
>> 5 days to go and these bits left....
>>
>> > * connection pinning
>> > I thinking it's been outstanding long enough we should get it into
>> 3.1,
>> > even if we have to hold PRE1 a week after the branch to stabilize it
>> (or
>> > test it in PRE1 ?).
>> >
>>
>> Awaiting merge. (1-2 days).
>
> Do we go from trunk to PRE or from trunk to DEVEL? I do not think trunk
> code is stable enough to be called PRE at this point, so I was expecting
> DEVEL. Personally, I would just call it 3.1.0 and categorize it as
> "development" on the web site until we can move it into the stable
> category (after a few 3.1.x releases).

i ws
>
>> > * kerberos helper
>> > Markus has supplied another set of code, I assume its been tested
>> > externally and just needs a drop-in.
>> >
>>
>> Awaiting re-submission with some alterations. Non-blocker.
>>
>> > * eCAP
>> >
>>
>> Awaiting merge submission.
>>
>> > * source layout
>> >
>>
>> Started. Non-blocker.
>>
>> > * source formatting
>> > scripts committed for use already, I was planning on starting the
>> > re-format and testbed run today here.
>>
>> Now waiting on completion of other feature code.
>>
>>
>> Other misc stuff which qualifies but need some work if people have time:
>>
>> Awaiting a verify:
>> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2433
>>
>> Awaiting a verify test and debug:
>> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2393
>>
>> Awaiting a developer:
>> * testbed level-02-maximus.opts
>> opposite of minimal. Everything enabled, leave configure to handle
>> clashes properly etc.
>
> Other important problems:
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2459
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2460
>
> I have asked somebody to work on these for the next 10 days, but I do
> not know if they will be able to fix them. I can work on them after
> eCAP.
>
> Also, it would be nice to review and commit TCP_RESET propagation patch:
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2042
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alex.
>
>
>
Received on Wed Sep 24 2008 - 01:54:40 MDT