On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 02:16 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >
> > Lets set a date: 29 September?
> >
> > Well, I'll call for a partial hold right now. Please only commit bug
> > fixes, minor cleanups, and features already on the roadmap for 3.1.
> > The rest can be queued for commit post branch.
> >
>
>
> 5 days to go and these bits left....
>
> > * connection pinning
> > I thinking it's been outstanding long enough we should get it into 3.1,
> > even if we have to hold PRE1 a week after the branch to stabilize it (or
> > test it in PRE1 ?).
> >
>
> Awaiting merge. (1-2 days).
Do we go from trunk to PRE or from trunk to DEVEL? I do not think trunk
code is stable enough to be called PRE at this point, so I was expecting
DEVEL. Personally, I would just call it 3.1.0 and categorize it as
"development" on the web site until we can move it into the stable
category (after a few 3.1.x releases).
> > * kerberos helper
> > Markus has supplied another set of code, I assume its been tested
> > externally and just needs a drop-in.
> >
>
> Awaiting re-submission with some alterations. Non-blocker.
>
> > * eCAP
> >
>
> Awaiting merge submission.
>
> > * source layout
> >
>
> Started. Non-blocker.
>
> > * source formatting
> > scripts committed for use already, I was planning on starting the
> > re-format and testbed run today here.
>
> Now waiting on completion of other feature code.
>
>
> Other misc stuff which qualifies but need some work if people have time:
>
> Awaiting a verify:
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2433
>
> Awaiting a verify test and debug:
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2393
>
> Awaiting a developer:
> * testbed level-02-maximus.opts
> opposite of minimal. Everything enabled, leave configure to handle
> clashes properly etc.
Other important problems:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2459
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2460
I have asked somebody to work on these for the next 10 days, but I do
not know if they will be able to fix them. I can work on them after
eCAP.
Also, it would be nice to review and commit TCP_RESET propagation patch:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2042
Cheers,
Alex.
Received on Tue Sep 23 2008 - 15:26:44 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 24 2008 - 12:00:06 MDT