fre 2006-05-19 klockan 14:05 +1200 skrev Reuben Farrelly:
> I've just found a minor bug related to this. By specifying in my squid.conf:
>
> wccp2_router 192.168.0.1
>
> then I get no debugging, no wccp2 functionality, and no warning that the syntax
> is incorrect (bungled?). Unfortunately the documentation example in squid.conf
> doesn't state that a port number is required. (Although the README.wccpv2 does,
> but we can't assume that everyone will go looking for it in /doc).
>
> I suggest that if no port is specified, we default to 2048, the same as WCCPv1,
> or else I guess I can write a patch to fix the documentation.
Right,
to make it even more fun it currently ignores the port entirely..
Please try if the current source works better for you. Should understand
hosts proper.
It will still silently ignore if you specify only a port, and also
ignores any port number you specify.
Regards
Henrik
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 12:00:04 MDT