Re: [PATCH] Hot idle

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 03:28:22 +1200

Hi Alex,
is this patch going in to trunk? it has passed the 10-day criteria.

PS. Please dont see my request about that assert as a blocker. It was
just a protest against adding another one. (Unless of course you figured
out a good way to avoid it while still warning about the error condition
it alerts to.)

Amos
Received on Fri Sep 27 2013 - 15:28:29 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Amos Jeffries: "Re: Squid 3.4.0.1 configurator problems"
Previous message: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [PATCH] Fix leaks and check for newer libraries in Kerberos related helpers"
In reply to: Alex Rousskov: "Re: [PATCH] Hot idle"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Sep 27 2013 - 12:00:11 MDT