Re: MD5 and URL validation (continue to other very old thread)

On 11/23/2012 7:29 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 23/11/2012 4:20 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>> The last post I wrote with the very very long diff seems to be the one.
>
> You referring to the email of 24th Oct? You said that was not quite
> ready and I can see a lot of formatting bits with missing lines which
>
Well it wasnt formatted and not ready as "PATCH" but ready as works and
tested with specific problem I'm not sure why segmentation happens and I
want to solve it.

<SNIP>
>> (I rewrote *some* code about 5 times to match updates)
>
> I'm not very keen the idea of having the visible parts of it present but
> not working. Whatever goes into trunk needs to perform as documented -
> omitting a bundled helper and marking some store types as not-tested-yet
> is fine. But the Squid portion needs to at least be usable when it goes
> public.
>
> We can break the whole project changes down into a few individual steps.
>
> 1) a patch that only does all those url() --> originalUrl() changes.
> That will shrink down the amount of work a lot and I think can be done
> right now, yes?
OK will do.
>
> 2) review of the feature patch to see if there are any other bits like
> above, or if the whole thing is ready.
>
> 3) release notes and config documentation.
Will get there when.. we will.

Eliezer

-- 
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer <at> ngtech.co.il