Re: Trying to improve the stability of the OpenBSD build nodes

On 20.06.2012 05:16, Kinkie wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Kinkie <gkinkie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> OpenBSD is not unsupported past 5.0 nowdays. I've dropped 4.8 from
>>>> the
>>>> stable branch matrix, left 4.9 there. But was wondering if we
>>>> should
>>>> continue to test on 4.8/4.9 at all on 3.2+
>>>
>>> Well, the build issues there are squid-caused from what I can see,
>>> caused by the unavailability of Shm and failures to properly link
>>> in
>>> the wake of its absence - it may be the only platform we have which
>>> doesn't support shm and  this may be its value.
>>> Apart from that, I'll just set up a new OpenBSD node and drop the
>>> older ones, no problem.
>>
>> Hm.. OpenBSD 5.1 on amd64 is having kernel crash issues on kvm.
>> I'll try x86.
>
> The x86 OpenBSD 5.1 node seems stable; if nobody objects I'll
> gradually dismiss the other nodes.

4.8 can go IMO. I'm kind of in favour of keeping 4.9 around just to
maintain 3.1 support.

Amos
Received on Tue Jun 19 2012 - 23:38:16 MDT