fre 2012-04-13 klockan 11:44 -0300 skrev Marcus Kool:
> There is no formal definition in the RFC of what a "file extension"
> is. So the question is: is the file extension of
> http://zzz.com/1409303.mp4?p1=2012-xxx
> "mp4" ?
The use of file extension is a major bug in the ICAP protocol imho.
> If yes, I will file a bug report.
I think so. But it's non-trivial to define what an file extension is in
HTTP terms as you probably know.
Last in URL-path?
Embedded in query parameters?
From Content-Disposition?
Derived from Content-Type?
Regards
Henrik
Received on Fri Apr 13 2012 - 18:15:21 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Apr 14 2012 - 12:00:09 MDT