Now <http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2956>.
Can anyone else reproduce this? I'm a bit surprised it hasn't bitten someone else.
On 16/02/2010, at 5:45 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> - it *does* hit VARY_REFRESH first
> - threshold for the vary problem is much lower
> - evident since (at least) Squid 2.7STABLE1
-- Mark Nottingham mnot_at_yahoo-inc.comReceived on Thu Jun 17 2010 - 01:11:20 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 17 2010 - 12:00:07 MDT