Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 10:03:11 -0500
Not sure what went wrong, but since changes in each of the 3 files are minimal I included differences as attachments (new version for each file is on top, old version is on bottom):
neighbor.cc_diff.jpg - shows changes in neighbor.cc file in the peerAllowedToUse method.
structs.h_diff.jpg - shows a single variable that has been added to onoff struct in the structs.h file.
cf.data.pre_diff.jpg - shows info that has been added for a new access_sibling_for_stale_resource directive in cf.data.pre.
Let me know what you think. I can try couple different things with Bazaar to generate correct patch file if needed.
Thanks in advance,
Senad
-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3_at_treenet.co.nz]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 6:55 PM
To: squid-dev_at_squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] Squid Patch (revision 10487)
On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:25:31 -0500, <senad.cimic_at_thomsonreuters.com>
wrote:
> Attached file is generated patch for the issue where squid does not
> contact its siblings for the stale resources. New directive has been
> added to make this behavior optional.
>
> Let me know if any issues.
Something has gone wrong in the patch creation or formatting process. Each
file that you have altered even slightly is removed completely and replaced
with a whole new version. This makes it extremely hard to tell what changes
you have made.
Amos
