Hi all,
I believe that the D&C design is better than Universal Buffer because
of many reasons. My sense is that the Universal Buffer will be very
complex and will not have the desired results, because the real problems
exist in other subsystems (eg parsers).
But if choosing the D&C design means that we are going to wait for 2 or
more years to be implemented because of the lack of the development time
maybe it is better to accept the Universal Buffer design. It will not
solve all the problems but it is not bad, it is an improvement.
But again I like the idea of a well designed Buffers Api, where buffer
classes handle different cases and String be a class (or classes) which
operates on Buffer (sub-)regions.
Regards,
Christos.
Received on Wed Jan 21 2009 - 23:25:49 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jan 22 2009 - 12:00:04 MST