Re: Making start/stop idempotent

Sounds good.

To be clear; -k shutdown and rotate will exit(0); the rest (including
kill and interrupt?) will exit(1) as before.

On 30/10/2008, at 10:58 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> On tor, 2008-10-30 at 10:03 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Hmm, good point. My aim was just start and stop. Seem reasonable to
>> just limit it to those two?
>
> Yes. And maybe maybe rotate.
>
> Regards
> Henrik

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com