Re: pseudo-specs for a String class

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:49:43 +0200

On tis, 2008-08-26 at 09:27 +0200, Kinkie wrote:

> > Does your internal buffer point back to each String using it? (QQQ)
>
> Shouldn't be needed, so I plan not to.

It's very useful for debugging and analysis however... but a complete
waste for production.

Regards
Henrik

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

Received on Tue Aug 26 2008 - 20:49:48 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kinkie: "Re: pseudo-specs for a String class"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: CVS mirror"
In reply to: Kinkie: "Re: pseudo-specs for a String class"
Next in thread: Kinkie: "Re: pseudo-specs for a String class"
Reply: Kinkie: "Re: pseudo-specs for a String class"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Aug 27 2008 - 12:00:06 MDT