Re: plain patches and shared bundlebuggy

Guido,

This is why I've been asking about migrating squid-2 to subversion
instead of bzr for the time being. This seems like a good
middle-ground - merging is still a bit whack, but for the most part,
its much better than CVS, it'll keep full history for when a migration
to bzr finally happens, and there's 100% working windows support.

I dunno why, the other active developers seem to think this is a bad
idea for some reason.

So again, i'd like to propose migrating Squid-2 to subversion for the
time being to make development easier and maintain Windows
compatibility for Guido and any other interested Windows dev.

Adrian

2008/7/23 Guido Serassio <guido.serassio_at_acmeconsulting.it>:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> At 09.00 22/07/2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>>
>> On tis, 2008-07-22 at 12:58 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> > I'd be quite happy with a migration to svn for the time being so Guido
>> > can continue working on Squid-2-Win32 without worrying about VCS
>> > portability related issues.
>>
>> I think it should work equally well moving the NT branch back to
>> SourceForge until bzr is fixed, and ask Guido to submit patches when
>> needed via squid-dev.
>
> I think that now is time to stop the wasting of my very limited free time.
>
> So, I have a more effective proposal that will fix definitively all Windows
> portability problems:
>
> - Drop Windows from Squid 2 and 3 supported platforms
> - Delete my account from squid-cache.org
> - Remove my sourceforge account from Squid developers
>
> Regards
>
> Guido
>
>
>
> -
> ========================================================
> Guido Serassio
> Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
> Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
> Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115
> Email: guido.serassio_at_acmeconsulting.it
> WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
>
>
Received on Wed Jul 23 2008 - 07:22:01 MDT