Re: Bug #1893; why's it incomplete?

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_creative.net.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:50:18 +0800

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

[snip]

> Probably better to rethink the patch to use the "vary id" as a timestamp
> instead, marking objects with an older update time as stale.

Are there any objections to removing this patch from Squid-2.HEAD and
documenting this discussion (and other Vary related stuff) on a wiki page?

A Cacheboy tester has noted that there's a definite drop in hit rate between
2.6/2.7 and Cacheboy; the only thing I can really associate it with is this
Vary stuff. (He's testing out this theory at the moment.)

Adrian

-- 
- Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -
- $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -
Received on Wed Jun 11 2008 - 09:47:34 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 11 2008 - 12:00:05 MDT