Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> Unfortunatelly it did not.
>>
>> 2008/05/20 21:23:43| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 97 to
>> 192.168.1.177:6013: (98) Address already in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:23:43| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
>> in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:23:44| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 95 to
>> 192.168.1.177:6013: (98) Address already in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:23:44| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
>> in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:23:44| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 95 to
>> 192.168.1.177:6013: (98) Address already in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:23:44| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
>> in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:23:44| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 97 to
>> 192.168.1.177:6013: (98) Address already in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:23:44| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
>> in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:23:45| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 101 to
>> 192.168.1.177:6013: (98) Address already in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:23:45| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
>> in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:24:10| IPInterception.cc(136) NetfilterInterception: NF
>> getsockopt(SO_ORIGINAL_DST) failed: (11) Resource temporarily
>> unavailable
>> 2008/05/20 21:24:10| IPInterception.cc(169) NetfilterTransparent: NF
>> getsockopt(IP_TRANSPARENT) failed: (92) Protocol not available
>> 2008/05/20 21:24:39| IdleConnList::removeFD: FD 78 NOT FOUND!
>> 2008/05/20 21:25:46| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 30 to
>> 192.168.1.177:3976: (98) Address already in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:25:46| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
>> in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:25:47| IPInterception.cc(136) NetfilterInterception: NF
>> getsockopt(SO_ORIGINAL_DST) failed: (11) Resource temporarily
>> unavailable
>> 2008/05/20 21:25:47| IPInterception.cc(169) NetfilterTransparent: NF
>> getsockopt(IP_TRANSPARENT) failed: (92) Protocol not available
>> 2008/05/20 21:25:53| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 35 to
>> 192.168.1.177:3976: (98) Address already in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:25:53| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
>> in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:25:59| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 31 to
>> 192.168.1.177:3977: (98) Address already in use
>> 2008/05/20 21:25:59| comm.cc(994) commResetFD: bind: (98) Address already
>> in use
>>
>>
>> 2008/5/20 Anton VG <anton.vazir_at_gmail.com>:
>>> Will try it now... already compiling.
>>>
>
> Doh! I see the flaw in my thinking. That won't work when the new address
> is not found.
>
> I've just committed a better debug booster in revision 9002. It now shows
> the output of each lookup at debug level 85,9.
>
> I think we are going to need a trace of fd_table[fd] and the
> NetfilterTransparent(...) parameters when those IP_TRANSPARENT errors are
> happening.
>
> And a backtrace when the bind error is displayed. I really don't think the
> port should be set on those outgoing binds. But finding the right place to
> suppress it is tricky.
>
Hi, sorry I let this drop.
Are you still available for testing? Any progress on the above questions?
Amos
-- Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE1 or 3.0.STABLE6Received on Mon Jun 02 2008 - 11:48:34 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 03 2008 - 12:00:02 MDT