Re: Problems with Limecast Server

On lör, 2008-05-17 at 08:52 +0200, Sven Köhler wrote:

> This ICY crap (yes, i call it crap, because a HTTP-request deserves a
> HTTP response, and sending this ICY crap instead is really a bad idea,
> whoever had it) seems to be pretty wide spread. Just checked many of the
> streams at shoutcast.com.
>
> But you never heard about that? Am i the first one who complains?

Heard of it, seen it, but you are the first to complain. Probably
because the "protocol upgrade" performed by Squid is fairly new, only
seen in 3.0 or 2.7.

> Can this HTTP 0.9 support be switched off somehow? If the first line of
> the reply is not "HTTP.*", then i don't want it ...

HTTP/0.9 is/was headerless, and it's very unlikely the first line of an
HTTP/0.9 response starts with HTTP

Regards
Henrik
Received on Sat May 17 2008 - 18:25:05 MDT