> On ons, 2007-09-26 at 11:53 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> It occurs to me that a method superficially similar to that used for
>> cache_peer could look nice here.
>>
>> - define icap_service with specific details, options +name on a single
>> line
>> - define icap_access <name> <acl ...>
>
> Isn't that what is already there?
>
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/cfgman/icap_access.html
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
Weird. You are right.
icap_class even says "If there are multiple services per vectoring point,
they are processed in the specified order."
Which entire point of this thread AFAIK is that there _aren't_ multiple
services allowed in Squid3 per vectoring point.
Amos
Received on Wed Sep 26 2007 - 18:08:22 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Oct 01 2007 - 12:00:05 MDT