Re: IPv6 developments for HEAD

> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 17:24 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> Attached are two patches which constitute part of the core developments
>> for protocol-independent handling of IP addresses in squid3.
>
> In your opinion, should these be committed to Squid 3.0? Are they likely
> to cause short-term stability problems? Should they be applied to Squid
> 3.1 instead?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Alex.
>

Yes. No. both?.

I would like to see them in 3.0.

The new object I am submitting is isolated 'infrastructure' which does not
affect the rest of squid in any way. It is itself the stable base needed
for future work.
The update to rfc1035 is a reversal of previous changes which is again
stabilising that area a little more.

I'm still a little fuzzy on the consensus of what the difference between
3.0 and 3.1 is. I would like these to be applied to HEAD.

Amos
Received on Tue Apr 10 2007 - 17:41:53 MDT