Re: 2.6stable5 icap client - reqmod problems with webwasher 5.x and 6

Does it work for your setup?

_J

>>> "Westerhold, Axel" <Axel.Westerhold@dts.de> 11/21/06 1:32 PM >>>
Hi Jeremy,

That definately more then I need to do :-) ! I will just have to get
rid of
the domain but your approach might be better for the future.

Axel

Am 21.11.2006 19:26 Uhr schrieb "Jeremy Hall" unter
<jehall@central.unicor.gov>:

> Hello,
>
> Here is the icap patch I am working on. It might not fully work,
> probably won't break much tho. It's not ready for merging, and the
> debug statements are wrong (shouldn't be prio 1) but I'm trying to
work
> out the kinks before readying it for merge.
>
> _J
>
>>>> "Westerhold, Axel" <Axel.Westerhold@dts.de> 11/21/06 12:54 PM >>>
> Hi All,
>
> I will have a look at the squid3 but I will need to modify it a
little
> bit
> so that I can split the Domain Part of the Username to make the
> webwasher
> happy on ist AD samaccount queries. From what I can see it should be
> easy
> enough to get this done inlcuding a way to enable/disable this
feature
> (like
> the one I did for 2.x).
>
> Also, I just shipped a 2.6 ICAP Patched Squid in a cluster setup to
a
> customer with 1000 Users. This Pilot Installation will get me a good
> feeling
> how stable 2.6 works.
>
> Regards,
> Axel
>
>
> Am 20.11.2006 22:57 Uhr schrieb "Tsantilas Christos" unter
> <chtsanti@users.sourceforge.net>:
>
>> Hi all,
>> The reported problems exists and are not webwasher related, exists
> for
>> every icap server.
>>
>> Axel's solutions causes crashes to squid in some cases. I think it
>> happens when http client closes the connection before the
connection
> to
>> the icap server closed. I am not sure it needs more debugging.
>> I am planning to give some more time...
>>
>> However, the squid3 with icap client is more stable than squid-26
> with
>> icap patch. I think the squid3 has only 2-3 bugs before the
release.
>> My opinion is that it does not make sense for someone to spend time
> in
>> squid26 icap client, it is good for testing and development but
only
>> that .....
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christos
>>
>> Westerhold, Axel wrote:
>>> Well,
>>>
>>> as I have a customer waiting for a fix I will just go with my
> modification
>>> and will try to pin down the real fault when I have some free time
>>> available. Setting the major version the way I do should not have
a
> real
>>> impact at least I can't see one right now on my test system.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Axel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Received on Tue Nov 21 2006 - 12:47:47 MST