Re: [VOTE] Squid-3.0.PRE4 release criteria

Hi Henrik & Doug,

At 02.21 06/05/2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

>lör 2006-05-06 klockan 12:08 +1200 skrev Doug Dixon:
>
> > Option 1 - severity based
> > We release PRE4 when all the criticals and blockers have been fixed.
>
>Over optimistic. This is the quality level required for a RC/STABLE
>release.
>
> > Option 2 - hand-picked
> > We hand pick a fixed list of bugs which we think we can fix within a
> > reasonably short time. We release when they are all fixed. No other
> > bugs can enter the list once it is picked.
> >
> > Option 3 - time based
> > We release PRE4 on June 1, and fix whatever bugs we can until then
> > (blockers first).
>
>Combination of 2 & 3 is my vote.
>
>Start with a hand picked list and a target date. Adjust the list over
>time, removing items found to not be realistic for the target date and
>add items which is found sufficiently important, and if necessary to
>preserve reasonable faith in the release adjust the time (limited +1
>week or so, no limit on early release when goals met).
>
>This is a scaled down version of the process currently used for the
>STABLE releases.
>
>Regards
>Henrik

I fully agree with the Henrik's vote.

Regards

Guido

-
========================================================
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115
Email: guido.serassio@acmeconsulting.it
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
Received on Sat May 06 2006 - 04:05:12 MDT