Re: [patch] refresh bugs

On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 19:08 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> > 3. handleIMSGiveClientNewEntry() used to call processMiss() - this
> > caused the duplicate request in bug 1561, and has gone. Was there a
> > reason for doing it this way that still stands?
>
> Not that I can think of.

I can think of one possibility:
ESI needs a full body to process - an IMS hit on an ESI page requires
all the included pages to also be unmodified. So it may have been how I
ensured we processed a full page. But it sure sounds suspect, like its
bitrotted since that original intent.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.