Re: problems with the squid-2.5 connection pinning

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
To: "Steven Wilton" <swilton@q-net.net.au>
Cc: <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 2:43 PM
Subject: RE: problems with the squid-2.5 connection pinning

>ons 2006-04-19 klockan 07:38 +0800 skrev Steven Wilton:
>
>> When I was sending the "Connection: Proxy-support" header, IE only sent
>> the
>> initial request, and never actually tried to complete the NTLM
>> authentication handshake. Removing this header made everything work
>> again.
>
>Odd..
>
>> I still have the "Proxy-Support: Session-Based-Authentication" header (as
>> specified in the document fragment that you posted to the list). I'm not
>> sure if that makes any difference for child proxies, and IE works both
>> with
>> and without this header.
>
>
>The reason to this header is child proxies not having support for this
>kind of connections. By having it in the Connection header such child
>proxies won't forward the header to it's clients.
>
>
>Hmm.. are you running transparent interception? If so then none of this
>applies. The header is only relevant on proxied connections, not
>intercepted connections.

Yes, I am running transparent interception. Are both these headers only
relevant for non-transparent connections? If so, I can enable/disable them
depending on which acceleration options are enabled.

regards

Steven
Received on Wed Apr 19 2006 - 06:48:03 MDT