fre 2006-02-24 klockan 18:21 -0700 skrev Duane Wessels:
> Because I think its annoying to have to write
>
> if (foo) {
> foo->unlock();
> foo = NULL;
> }
>
> in so many places.
Indeed.
> I started down that path and wasted about 4 days on it. Switching
> from normal pointers to ::Pointer is not pleasant for something
> that is used so pervasively.
Not sure I see the problem. The typing overhead in the source should be
the same as in the macro approach, except that it can be automated a bit
more..
But in this light the macro change if expanding to something like the
above is in fact a step forward, unifying the code and making the
refcount transition easier.
In fact this reminds me of the cbdata macros..
pointer = cbdataReference(original_pointer);
cbdataReferenceDone(pointer);
where cbdataReferenceDone is essentially the if block quoted above, plus
some cosmetics for debugging purposes.
Regards
Henrik
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Feb 28 2006 - 12:00:05 MST