Re: Squid-2.5.STABLE9-RC1 available

Hi,

At 02:22 a.m. 21/02/2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
>
>>Is there any chance that someone could take a look at
>>http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1211 - and verify that
>>none of the compiler warnings listed are actual and real errors?
>
>Nothing looks harmful, but it is obviously good if the errors are
>corrected allowing Squid to be built with this compiler.
>
>>I guess it's a little late to be getting this properly fixed before -STABLE9,
>
>Depends on the scale of the changes needed. So far it looks like only
>trivial changes to clean things up slightly. No real errors so far, but
>one false warning and one warning I don't understand what it is about
>(sentinel, what is that?).

All compiles cleanly now, thanks :)

Reuben
Received on Sun Feb 20 2005 - 12:35:35 MST