Hi,
At 12:13 a.m. 21/02/2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>In preparation for the upcoming Squid-2.5.STABLE9 release there is now a
>Squid-2.5.STABLE9-RC1 (Release Candidate 1) release available, a few days
>later than hoped due to connectivity problems at my ISP.
>
>Changes to squid-2.5.STABLE9 ()
>
> - [Minor] relaxed_header_parser extended to work around even more
> broken web servers (Bug #1242)
> - [Minor] FTP gatewaying URLs cleaned up slightly, mainly to work
> better with Mozilla but also to improve security slightly on
> non-anonymous FTP.
> - [Minor] High characters allowed un-encoded in FTP and Gopher
> listings to allow the user-agent to display data in non-iso8859-1
> charsets. (Bug #1220)
> - [Cosmetic] format fixes to silence compiler warnings on many
> platforms.
> - [Major] Assertion failures on certain odd DNS responses (Bug #1234)
>
>The final 2.5.STABLE9 release is expected on Thursday.
>
>Regards
>Henrik
Is there any chance that someone could take a look at
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1211 - and verify that none
of the compiler warnings listed are actual and real errors?
I guess it's a little late to be getting this properly fixed before
-STABLE9, but if any of those warnings are actual bugs then it'd be a good
thing to pick them up now rather than after the release. None show up with
gcc-3.4.3.
gcc.gnu.org suggests that the expectation for a GCC 4.0 release date is
April 15th so hopefully those errors are 'real' warnings and not just gcc
bugs ;-)
Reuben
Received on Sun Feb 20 2005 - 04:41:50 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Feb 25 2005 - 12:00:03 MST