On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:35:02 +0100 (CET)
Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Evgeny Kotsuba wrote:
>
>> Well, why it is parsed properly without return
>
> It didn't. Earlier versions just did not notice it could not parse
>this malformed header properly..
>
>> and why Mozilla/IE with
>> direct connection can parse it properly ?
>
> Question is if they can.
>
> Yes, they probably show the expected content, but did they parse the
>header proper?
Users now are standing up on these rakes and say: "Why today I can't
do thing that I can do yesterday ?"
They don't want to know - did they can parse somethig or not , they
know that it woked yesterday.
SY,
Evgeny Kotsuba
Received on Mon Feb 14 2005 - 15:45:51 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Feb 25 2005 - 12:00:03 MST