Re: Patch Submission - Header Manipulation

On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 11:52 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > I've no idea about the same... that said, we could use the 'if its gcc
> > 3.x it will be ok approach'. And yes, replacing our implementations with
> > STL typedefs would be a reasonable approach to migrating/coexisting.
>
> What would be the benefits of using STL if we still need to have the code
> compatible with non-STL environments?

the STL implementations of sets, vectors lists etc have very well
defined big-O complexity, and typically are very efficient.

Rob