On Tue, Feb 24, 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > FWIW mem_node existed before I did anything, but was linked lists not
> > splays.
>
> Right, it is the low end storage for the mem object. Was a linked list as
> it always was linear and most often quite small with one reader and one
> writer.
>
> Adrian, have you fiddled with the read ahead window size or otherwise
> allowing very large objects in cache_mem?
>
> In addition, is the requests send by the client plain GET requests or are
> ranges involved?
Absolutely no idea. It wasn't a core, so I didn't save it.
I'll see if I can re-fiddle things to make it happen again.
No, I haven't fiddled with anything save that patch.
Adrian
Received on Tue Feb 24 2004 - 06:38:23 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Mon Mar 01 2004 - 12:00:04 MST