Re: wccpv2 and L2 redirection

From: Joey Coco <anesthes@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:36:59 -0500 (EST)

Hi,

I tried doing this in my network. We run about 150mb and 8 squid cache
box's. Found using transparency and a load balanced route map works
better.

-- Joe

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, John El-Rassi wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to implement squid+wccp along with a cisco 3550. i was able to compile the visolve wccp2 patch for squid and the kernel. and got them running okay.
>
> However, when i run Squid in wccpv1 (and the cisco 3550) the cisco only redirects traffic destined for itself. (i have an open case with cisco about this).
>
> So i tried implementing wccpv2. to my dismay the cisco 3550 does not support wccpv2 with GRE packet redirection. it must use Layer 2 redirection. so when i run squid with the wccpv2 i get the following errors on the cisco 3550 (off course i change both configs on cisco and squid wccp2_router and ip wccp version 2)
>
> 17:19:43: WCCP-EVNT:wccp_update_assignment_status: enter
> 17:19:43: WCCP-EVNT:wccp_update_assignment_status: exit
> 17:19:43: WCCP-EVNT:S00: Here_I_Am packet from 142.46.145.4 w/bad fwd method 00000001, was offered 00000002
> 17:19:43: WCCP-EVNT:S00: Here_I_Am packet from 142.46.145.4 with incompatible capabilites
>
> Questions
>
> 1. i was wondering if there has been anywork done to support wccpv2+Layer 2 (instead of GRE)
>
> 2. what is causing the cisco (in wccpv1) to only redirect traffic when destined to itself.
>
> anyhelp would be much appreciated.
>
> thank you,
>
> John
>
> johne@jolera.com
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Nov 11 2003 - 17:27:24 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:20:47 MST