Re: Branching 3.0?

On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 11:02, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Friday 25 April 2003 01.25, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Well,
> > AFAIK we can branch 3.0 now - any reason now to?
>
> There is no need to branch 3.0 until there is other stuff pending for
> HEAD which should not be in 3.0.

I'd like to get 3.0 out to the users - the primary goal of 3.0 is
understanding the impact of the C++ conversion. There are now no
reproducible bugs in the 3.0 blocking list that aren't also 2.5 bugs.

So, while branching is orthogonal, I'd really really like us to mark 3.0
PRE1, or have a list of what is needed to make marking 3.0 PRE1
sensible.

Oh, and I do have further things in the works, but I'd rather not be
destabilising 3.0 after having tackled all the reported bugs...

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.