I'd always thought that sbin was limited to dangerous suid tools. I'm not
disturbed by this, just querying the rational as it hadn't been discussed in
advance of the change.
Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Cooper" <joe@swelltech.com>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@syncretize.net>
Cc: <hno@squid-cache.org>; <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: squid/src Makefile.am
> [root@delilah proc]# which sendmail httpd named in.telnetd dhcpd ntpd
> /usr/sbin/sendmail
> /usr/sbin/httpd
> /usr/sbin/named
> /usr/sbin/in.telnetd
> /usr/sbin/dhcpd
> /usr/sbin/ntpd
>
> But then, maybe I'm being a Linux bigot to think that is the Right Way.
>
> I'd be inclined to agree with Henrik on this one.
>
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > Why? Squid runs quite happily as a user binary, non-suid, on high port
> > numbers, as well as as a chrooted app or a traditional daemon...
> >
> > Rob
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <hno@squid-cache.org>
> > To: <squid-cvs@squid-cache.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 1:00 AM
> > Subject: cvs commit: squid/src Makefile.am
> >
> >
> >
> >>hno 2002/07/12 09:00:10 MDT
> >>
> >> Modified files:
> >> src Makefile.am
> >> Log:
> >> Moved squid to sbin
> >>
> >> Revision Changes Path
> >> 1.27 +3 -1 squid/src/Makefile.am
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
> Web caching appliances and support.
> http://www.swelltech.com
>
>
Received on Sat Jul 13 2002 - 04:24:58 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:15:48 MST