On Thursday 20 June 2002 23.45, Jeffrey D. Wheelhouse wrote:
> Also, for better or worse, I've attached the rproxy-based patch to
> turn #define READ_AHEAD_GAP into squid.conf-based read_ahead_gap.
> As provided, this patch shouldn't change functionality at all
> unless read_ahead_gap is set to a non-default setting.
Great. I'll add this to HEAD. Does not really belong in rproxy, and
creating a new branch for such a small non-intrusive change is a bit
overkill..
> As previously stated, I can't speak intelligently about the value
> of changing the read_ahead_gap. I know only that it helps my
> situation and may be of use in managing memory for others. I don't
> intend this in lieu of finding the actual problem that causes hangs
> with certain values in my environment, only as a band-aid until I
> know enough to do that.
The hangs is not a reason for using this patch, but the ability to act
as a better reverse-proxy in front of resource intensive web servers
is a good enough reason for the feature.
> If you want it, you're welcome to it. If you don't want it, it'll
> live happily ever after in my local repository and never bother you
> again. :)
It would be great if some time could be spent on trying to identify
what is the real cause to your problems..
Regards
Henrik
Received on Fri Jun 21 2002 - 14:34:13 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:15:41 MST