Hi,
I'm running our production caches on Solaris8 x86 for quite some time,
and I consider Solaris performing well. At high loads even better than
Linux.
We could discuss offlist the issues you have with Sol and see if its
related to solaris as such or there is something to tune. There are
some TCP tunables and kernel bits to tweak.
On 19 Mar 2002, at 18:01, Duane Wessels <wessels@squid-cache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm preparing to run a suite of benchmarks on five different operating
> systems, all running on the same hardware. I have: linux, freebsd,
> openbsd, netbsd, and solaris.
>
> I've run some preliminary tests where Squid doesn't cache anything
> on disk (using null storage scheme). The solaris box performs
> significantly worse than the others. Solaris gets about 150 TPS
> while the others get from 210-290 TPS.
>
> I've tried the obvious things: file descriptor limits, ephemeral
> port range, ...
>
> Does anyone have experience with solaris on x86? I'm trying to
> decide if its an inherent limitation, or should solaris be able to
> keep up with linux on the same hardware?
>
>
------------------------------------
Andres Kroonmaa <andre@online.ee>
CTO, Microlink Online
Tel: 6501 731, Fax: 6501 725
Pärnu mnt. 158, Tallinn,
11317 Estonia
Received on Wed Mar 20 2002 - 02:59:39 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:52 MST