RE: cache.ident

> On Monday 18 March 2002 08:55, Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
>
> > I've begun working on this last week.. For now I have a
> > semi-complete configuration format parser (the foundation is there,
> > it just doesn't understand all the opcodes), and established hooks
> > (#warning's for now) in the code as to WHERE I have to act next.
>
> Excellent. Wasn't sure if you had got started yet.

I was on the mountains, and it was raining. Skiing was out of the
question (believe me, I tried), so...

> > It still doesn't have its own CVS branch, but I plan to make it
> > soon.
>
> Please do.

Later on today. In a fit of creativity, I'll name the branch
"customlog".

> Don't forget to get a up to date cvsmkbranch script to avoid the
> problem reported by Guido some days ago. Also OK to use a script
> prior to where I screwed things up..

Is what can be checked out from the website OK?

> > Notice that I changed the format specification slightly to make
> > room for opcodes you hadn't included, and to make the parsing
> > process more straightforward.
>
> Good, but please commit your changes to the specification.
>
> As you may have noticed I made some syntax corrections and minor
> cleanups to the spec last week, but nothing major.

Hm... I'll have to compare then, I did a bit of remodeling too.

-- 
	/kinkie