Re: breaking -HEAD

On Wed, Feb 13, 2002, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Fact:
>
> If you intentionally break HEAD then you basically leave me with two
> choices:
>
> a) No longer use HEAD as the base for my development and testing
> until HEAD again is functional.

Ok. How about this.

I'd like to have the current commloops code (obviously minus the
digest code) thoroughly tested before I move onto the next phase
of development. If a few of you could _please_ test the commloops
code again I'd be very happy. There's only so much testing that
I can do.

Adrian
Received on Wed Feb 13 2002 - 22:27:09 MST