Re: commloops testing

Hi Adrian,

Il 07.06 12/01/2002 Adrian Chadd ha scritto:

>hi guys,
>
>I _think_ I found the niggling bug left in the expired object/IMS
>magic in client_side.c, and after some polygraphing and local browser
>user the commloops branch seems to be stable.
>
>The commloops branch is basically as functional as the squid-HEAD branch,
>minus range request caching (so a range request is always uncacheable
>and is passed through to the server side vertabim atm).
>
>Could I possibly get some quick third-party testing to happen?

I can made a little test at home in this weekend using RHL 7.0 on Alpha.
Whant configure switch to you recommend ?

Guido

>I'd like to look at committing the current work set to squid-HEAD
>before I move onto the next phase of the commloops/modio work, so any
>third-party testing/feedback I can get from the squid-dev list members
>will be very appreciated!
>
>Just for those who aren't keeping up - I've reworked the storeClientCopy()
>call to actually be a stream rather than a copy from random parts of
>an object. Once this code is stable, squid will be much closer to supporting:
>
> * event IO (/dev/poll, kqueue, native win32 completion port stuff)
> * content modification (since its a stream rather than a "paged object"
> now,
> it ties into rbcollins' content module work from 2000/2001)
> * better storage manager (too long and hard to explain here :-)
>
>So I'm kind of hanging out to get this stuff tested, stable and committed
>before I move onto the next phase.
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>Adrian

-
=======================================================
Serassio Guido
Via Albenga, 11/4 10134 - Torino - ITALY
E-mail: serassio@interfree.it
         serassio@libero.it
WWW: http://www.serassio.it
Received on Sat Jan 12 2002 - 02:19:00 MST