Yes, you're seeing exactly the performance that you should expect from
such hardware. If you want faster, you'll either have to do some
serious coding (hacking on the eventio framework is probably a great
place to start, as Henrik and Adrian have suggested), or upgrade your
hardware. Additional disks and more RAM are a start, but you'll see CPU
saturation soon as well--650MHz isn't much for a well loaded Squid.
Venkatesh wrote:
> Hello joe,
>
> Another doubt. Consider my config. PIII 650 MHz. 1 18GB SCSI (2 partitions).
> 256x3GB Memory.
> cache_dir looks like,
> cache_dir aufs /cache0 6000 14 256
> cache_dir aufs /cache1 6000 14 256
>
> I am getting queue congestion and DISK I/O OVERLOADING errors in cache.log
> even for 120 req/sec. Do you say only this much can achive in linux with
> this config? If so, what are the major changes we have to be for in Squid
> filesystem side.
> As I already said, I am looking for very high performance Squid.
>
> One more thing, During this benchmark I have used very reliable 2.2.19 and
> reiserfs. So I am suspecting this.
--
Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
Affordable Web Caching Proxy Appliances
http://www.swelltech.com
Received on Wed Sep 12 2001 - 17:02:06 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:20 MST