On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Duane Wessels wrote:
>
> > Hm, I must be wrong. I thought the memory pools allocated large
> > chunks for small pointers and then divided them up, but I must
> > have imagined it. I don't see it in the code.
>
> It is on the to do, but conflicts with memory_pools_limit.
I do not think the conflict is a big deal though. When chunk
allocation is enabled, memory_pools_limit can be ignored (in favor of
a different option) or interpreted differently.
# TAG: memory_pools itemized|chunked|off
# TAG: memory_pools_limit (bytes) // ignored if chunked
# TAG: memory_pools_size (bytes) // ignored if itemized
or, simply,
# TAG: memory_pools itemized|chunked|off
# TAG: memory_pools_limit (bytes) // semantics depends on memory_pools
or something along these lines.
$0.02,
Alex.
Received on Tue Mar 27 2001 - 23:44:18 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:41 MST