I'd be in favour of excluding some status codes, rather than only
allowing 200's. Other response codes than 200 are cacheable in some
circumstances.
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Duane Wessels [mailto:wessels@squid-cache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 9:28 AM
> To: squid-dev@squid-cache.org
> Subject: [SQU] RELEASE/SWAPOUT (fwd)
>
>
> I wonder if we should change it so that only 200 responses appear
> in store.log?
>
> Duane W.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:53:59 +0200
> From: Dmitry Guyvoronsky <demiurg@webstore.kiev.ua>
> To: squid-users@ircache.net
> Subject: [SQU] RELEASE/SWAPOUT
> Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 04:54:56 -0700 (MST)
> Resent-From: squid-users@ircache.net
>
> Hi there!
>
> Can anyone explain me why my logs/store.log if full of message like
> 984398020.208 SWAPOUT 0000001B 200 984397747 984258678
> 984484147 text/html 16802/16802 GET
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-7.html
> 984398045.968 RELEASE FFFFFFFF 304 984397783 -1
> 984484183 unknown -1/0 GET
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-7.html
>
> It's example of when i loaded page twice from same browser. As i
> understand, at first time page was saved in disk cache, but when i
> requested it second time, it was removed. Both times i've got needed
> content directly from server :
>
> ... logs/access.log
> 984398020.907 15346 192.168.0.6 TCP_MISS/200 17164 GET
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-7.html -
> DIRECT/www.squid-cache.org text/html
> 984398045.968 4970 192.168.0.6 TCP_CLIENT_REFRESH_MISS/304
> 256 GET http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-7.html -
> DIRECT/www.squid-cache.org -
>
> --
> WBR Dmitry Guyvoronsky
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
>
>
>
Received on Tue Mar 13 2001 - 15:32:58 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:13:38 MST