wang_daqing wrote:
> But I also do not agree this. For you create a new system not like
> other filesystem. Why you want to operate them same way? I suggest
> abstract in object store layer not in filesystem layer.
The API is not moddeled like the UFS API, is is modelled around Squids
needs for object storage. Then there is a storage implemenation mapping
this to UFS calls.
> I don't know what are you thinking or feel about inode. I think a bit
> FAT is enough(one disk block one bit) for fsck.
That is a block bitmap, not a FAT. A FAT also contains file specific
information like block sequences.
/Henrik
Received on Thu Feb 03 2000 - 01:33:36 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:21 MST