Re: Squid 2.x performance curioisities

Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Dancer wrote:
>
> > Will try it when I get into the office (about 15 mins). Did I give you
> > the results of that last trial? With uncacheable objects the system
> > performed about 30 req/sec faster than its best using
> > rep_cachable:80/dhr:55.
>
> Yes, I've already commented that the difference is much smaller than I
> would expect.
>
> > Yet physical disk I/O was about the same during
> > each (virtually nil)
>
> Hmm.. There should be no disk traffic with uncachable replies and
> half-empty disks (no garbage collection). There should be a lot of disk
> traffic during polymix#1 runs.
>
> Alex.

There are some small amounts of disk/io showing up in vmstat..some of it
is obviously log-files. The other? Don't know. It's only trivial
amounts.

Time to step up to squid2.2S2. I've lost track of which version 2.x the
tests are being run under. 2.1.p2 I think.

D
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:57 MDT