Thanks Oskar.
Your TCP_REFRESH_HIT ratio is 67% of 0.0070%.
Of those few refreshes that you had there was fewer hits than I
expected, but still enought to suggest that I am thinking in the right
direction. However if the refresh ratio commonly is that small there is
no apparent need to bother with saving disk space on refreshes (less
than 0.5% estimated space saving).
How the ratios shown above is calculated:
67% = TCP_REFRESH_HIT / TCP_REFRESH*
0.0070% = TCP_REFRESH* / ALL_REQUESTS
/Henrik
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:56 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:02 MST