Re: mempool patches

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 22:48:34 +0200

Alex Rousskov wrote:

> The run duration is irrelevant. As you noticed yourself, the
> memory growth levels off after the warm-up period. After that,
> there is no additional fragmentation as far as memory pools are
> concerned because virtually no new memory is allocated (That is
> one of the reasons why Squid has memory pools!)

Which also tells us that there is no point in supporting freeing of
pooled memory, as virtualy nothing is freed either.

/Henrik
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:53 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:53 MST