Henrik Nordstrom writes:
>Duane Wessels wrote:
>>
>> If we get a write failure on a swapout, the total swap space
>> size is reduced to the current store_swap_size, but we don't
>> adjust the individual store_dir's because we don't bother to
>> work out which cache_dir the failed write was on.
>>
>> Duane W.
>
>Which means that if one cache_dir disk is gone, then Squid reduces the
>cache to 0?
I don't know what you mean by 'gone'? How does a cache_dir become gone?
If store_swap_size is 0 when a write() fails, then yes, it probably
reduces the size to zero.
Duane W.
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:51 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:51 MST