Re: Proposed refresh algorithm changes

From: Andres Kroonmaa <andre@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 10:47:00 +0300 (EETDST)

On 21 Jul 98, at 22:48, Henrik Nordstrom <hno@hem.passagen.se> wrote:

> Andres Kroonmaa wrote:
>
> > about flags, to conserve structure size, we might use lowest 1-2
> > bits of any relevant timestamp for bit-flags. We loose 1-4 sec on
> > precision which is not a very big issue I guess.
>
> How many refresh_pattern do you have? I don't think storage size is a
> very big issue here.
>
> We are not talking about adding a flag to store entries, only to the
> refresh_pattern entries.

 umm,
 I got the feeling that we'd need to add fields to StoreEntry structure... ;)

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Andres Kroonmaa mail: andre@online.ee
  Network Manager
  Organization: MicroLink Online Tel: 6308 909
  Tallinn, Sakala 19 Pho: +372 6308 909
  Estonia, EE0001 http://www.online.ee Fax: +372 6308 901
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:15:51 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:11:49 MST